How Postpartum Care Affects Breastfeeding Outcomes: An Evidence-Based Perspective
- Jacqueline Harler
- Jan 27
- 4 min read

How a baby is fed, whether through breast milk, formula, donor milk, or a combination, is a deeply personal decision shaped by health, circumstances, culture, and family needs. All of these feeding methods can support infant growth and development. However, research consistently shows that when parents choose to breastfeed, the level and quality of support they receive during the postpartum period plays a critical role in how successful and sustainable that experience is (McFadden et al., 2017).
This article explores the evidence behind postpartum support and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes, while maintaining a non-biased, family-centred approach to infant feeding.
The Role of Skilled Clinical Support
Professional breastfeeding support has been shown to significantly improve both breastfeeding initiation and duration. Assistance from trained healthcare providers such as midwives, nurses, and lactation consultants helps parents address common early challenges including latch difficulties, nipple pain, concerns about milk supply, and infant feeding effectiveness (McFadden et al., 2017).
A Cochrane Review of randomised controlled trials found that structured breastfeeding support increased rates of both exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding at three to six months postpartum, particularly when support was proactive rather than reactive (McFadden et al., 2017).
In addition, hospital practices such as early skin-to-skin contact, rooming-in, and access to skilled lactation support are associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes (Moore et al., 2016; WHO and UNICEF, 2018). These practices underpin Baby-Friendly care models, which aim to promote breastfeeding while avoiding coercion.
Emotional and Social Support in the Postpartum Period
Technical guidance alone is not sufficient. The postpartum period is physically demanding and emotionally intense, and psychosocial support has a significant influence on feeding outcomes. Parents with strong social support networks including partners, family members, peer groups, and community services report greater confidence and are more likely to continue breastfeeding when this is their intention (Dennis, 2002; Leahy-Warren et al., 2012).
Stress, fatigue, and low mood have been associated with earlier breastfeeding cessation (Brown and Lee, 2013). Practical help with household tasks, infant care, and rest can reduce the overall burden on new parents, indirectly supporting lactation by protecting physical recovery and emotional well-being.
Peer support interventions, including telephone-based, group-based, and digital programmes, have also demonstrated positive effects on breastfeeding continuation (Shakya et al., 2017). Feeling understood and validated can make feeding challenges feel more manageable and less isolating.
Early Follow-Up and Continuity of Care
Many parents discontinue breastfeeding not because they wish to stop, but because difficulties go unaddressed. Common concerns include pain, perceived low milk supply, infant weight issues, and receiving conflicting advice (Odom et al., 2013).
Evidence suggests that early and ongoing follow-up, particularly within the first two weeks postpartum, can prevent minor issues from becoming reasons for cessation. Home visits, outpatient lactation appointments, and telehealth consultations have all been associated with improved breastfeeding confidence and longer continuation rates (McFadden et al., 2017; Demirci et al., 2021). Continuity of care, where families are supported by familiar professionals who understand their history and goals, further enhances the effectiveness of postpartum support services.
Support Without Pressure
Crucially, high-quality postpartum care does not equate to pressure to breastfeed. When parents feel judged, coerced, or unsupported in their autonomy, both mental health and feeding outcomes may be negatively affected (Thomson et al., 2015). Guilt-based messaging and rigid expectations can contribute to anxiety, shame, and reduced parental confidence.
Evidence-based support is therefore defined not only by technical accuracy but also by its respect for informed choice. Family-centred care prioritises parental goals, acknowledges medical and structural barriers, and validates all feeding methods as legitimate ways to nourish a baby (WHO, 2020).
Conclusion
Postpartum support does not determine how a family should feed their baby. However, for those who want to breastfeed, adequate medical, emotional, and social support significantly increases the likelihood of a positive and sustainable experience (McFadden et al., 2017). When parents are supported rather than pressured, they are better able to meet their own feeding goals while protecting both infant health and parental well-being.
Infant feeding is not one-size-fits-all. Support should be.
Contact me to find out how I can support you with postpartum care.
References
Brown, A. and Lee, M. (2013) ‘Breastfeeding during the first year promotes satiety responsiveness in children aged 18–24 months’, Pediatric Obesity, 8(5), pp. 382–390.
Demirci, J.R., Bogen, D.L., Klionsky, Y. and Kjerulff, K.H. (2021) ‘Telelactation via mobile app: perspectives of rural mothers, their care providers, and lactation consultants’, Telemedicine and e-Health, 27(8), pp. 874–884.
Dennis, C.L. (2002) ‘Breastfeeding peer support: maternal and volunteer perceptions from a randomized controlled trial’, Birth, 29(3), pp. 169–176.
Leahy-Warren, P., McCarthy, G. and Corcoran, P. (2012) ‘First-time mothers: social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(3–4), pp. 388–397.
McFadden, A., Gavine, A., Renfrew, M.J., Wade, A., Buchanan, P., Taylor, J.L., Veitch, E., Rennie, A.M., Crowther, S.A., Neiman, S. and MacGillivray, S. (2017) ‘Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD001141.
Moore, E.R., Bergman, N., Anderson, G.C. and Medley, N. (2016) ‘Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD003519.
Odom, E.C., Li, R., Scanlon, K.S., Perrine, C.G. and Grummer-Strawn, L. (2013) ‘Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding’, Pediatrics, 131(3), pp. e726–e732.
Shakya, P., Kunieda, M.K., Koyama, M., Rai, S.S., Miyaguchi, M., Dhakal, S., Sandy, S., Sunguya, B.F. and Jimba, M. (2017) ‘Effectiveness of community-based peer support for mothers to improve their breastfeeding practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177434.
Thomson, G., Ebisch-Burton, K. and Flacking, R. (2015) ‘Shame if you do – shame if you don’t: women’s experiences of infant feeding’, Maternal & Child Nutrition, 11(1), pp. 33–46.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2020) Infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF (2018) Implementation guidance: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services – the revised Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative. Geneva: WHO.






Comments